Lokahi Connect
Makes a Difference
Structured Word Inquiry (SWI)
Structured Word Inquiry (SWI) is an evidence-based approach to literacy that invites students to explore the structure of English words through scientific investigation. Rather than relying on memorization, SWI encourages learners to ask questions:
What does the word mean?
What are its morphemes (prefixes, bases, suffixes)?
What are its morphological and etymological relatives?
How do the graphemes function within the word?
This method integrates morphology (word parts), etymology (word origins), and phonology (sounds) to help students understand that English spelling is logical and meaningful.
Spelling Does Much More Than Represent Speech Sounds
Daniel’s Story: From Overwhelm to Empowered Learning
At age nine, Daniel carried an alphabet soup of diagnoses: dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia, ADHD (inattentive type), generalized anxiety, and developmental coordination disorder. He was a bright, curious child, but language-based tasks filled him with dread and self-doubt. Like many twice-exceptional students, Daniel’s gifted thinking was trapped beneath layers of cognitive and emotional friction.
In early 2024, Daniel struggled profoundly with decoding, sight-word recognition, writing fluency, and basic math problem-solving. Standard interventions had failed to meet him where he was. His self-esteem was eroding. But that changed when he began working with Stephanie Steinshouer, a specialist in Structured Word Inquiry (SWI) and language-based learning disabilities.
Daniel received daily 1:1 instruction before school—five days a week. The sessions focused not on phonemic drills, but on understanding how English works, how words carry meaning, and how Daniel could use logic, not memorization, to read and write with confidence.
Evidence of Transformation
By early 2025, Daniel’s neuropsychological re-evaluation documented the following year-over-year gains:
Significant advances in reading:
Decoding
Sight-word identification
Phonological memory
Phonological awareness
Reading comprehension
Marked improvement in writing:
Letter fluency
Sentence combining and building
Spelling accuracy
➕ Progress in mathematics:
Word-based problem solving
Math fluency
Beyond academics, Daniel showed increased resilience, reduced anxiety, and more flexible executive functioning. These gains were achieved through a highly customized, integrative approach involving SWI and Mediated Learning Experience (MLE).
Why It Matters
Daniel is not just a student who made academic progress. He is proof of concept for an approach that respects how the neurodiverse brain learns. He thrived when the instruction shifted from rigid phonics to structured inquiry, when learning became about sense-making, not inconsistent rule-following.
Today, Daniel is reading. He is writing. He is beginning to believe in his own mind.
“While this level of progress is incredibly exciting, Daniel requires specialized support to make these gains.” —Dr. Philip Dunbar-Mayer, 2025 Neuropsychological Re-Evaluation
Support Stories Like Daniel’s
Your donation to Lokahi Connect fuels the interventions that make stories like Daniel’s possible. Together, we can rewrite the narrative for students with language-based learning differences, starting with the science, honoring the learner, and believing in their voice.
Why We’re Asking For Your Help
The National Reading Panel (NRP), established in 1997, conducted extensive research to determine effective methods for teaching children to read. Their 2000 report emphasized the importance of systematic instruction in five key areas:
Phonemic awareness
Phonics
Fluency
Vocabulary
Comprehension
Despite these findings, reading proficiency in the U.S. has remained largely stagnant over the past 30 years.
The "Science of Reading" movement has sought to align classroom instruction with evidence-based practices in recent years. Nevertheless, many schools continue to face challenges.
Factors such as inconsistent implementation, inadequate teacher training, and the persistence of outdated instructional methods have hindered widespread progress.
In summary, while the NRP provided a clear framework for reading instruction, systemic issues have limited the impact of the Science of Reading on improving reading outcomes nationwide.